Discussion about this post

User's avatar
𝐹𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝑁𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛 𝑆𝑘𝑦's avatar

Hi Mikaela ...the liver reprogramming hack you mention here... the Friedrich et al. paper... it is visceral. It is not "healing" in the poetic sense. It is routing around a failed node. The thymus bottlenecked. So they forced the liver to pick up the slack. That is how you fix a system that is too old to fix itself. You do not ask the broken part to work harder. You build a bypass.

And this Tripartite Model for valuing drug programs. Linking value to the "predictive validity" of the decision tool. That hits hard. We value the output (the drug. the treaty). We ignore the tool that got us there. If the tool has a 30-year latency... the value of the output is effectively zero.

So here is the question. We are building O(n log n) speed for proteins. We have optical read/write for brains. But we are still using low-fidelity, high-latency tools to decide which global problems to solve. Do we need a Tripartite Model for planetary survival... one that penalizes the "decision tools" (like bureaucracy) that are too slow to matter?

The first episode is live here... https://silentwitnessin.substack.com/p/file-001-the-thermodynamic-bluff?r=6r3orq

(My new serialized novel, The Man Who Blocked The Sun, follows a diabetic engineer who hacks the climate because the treaties are too slow. It'd mean the world to me if you'd join to follow the work.)

Expand full comment
Neural Foundry's avatar

Appreciate the breakdown on tripartite models here. The idea of explicitly tying decision tool quality to candidate value thru the correlation coefficient ρ makes alot of sense, especially when you consider how many pharma decisions fail not becuase of the candidate but the predictive validity of assays at each stage. I saw something similar play out at a biotech I was advising where early stage assays had good throughput but weak correlation with Phase II endpoints, and that mismatch basically created false confidence in the pipeline. Curious if there are practical limits to estimating ρ accurately in real scenarios, since rare event modeling is already dicey and layering in tool validity might amplify noise.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?